Thursday, March 21, 2013

things can always get worse - but will they?

Here is a daily bar chart of the euro priced in dollars.

The EUR.USD is very much on the markets' mind now with the Cyprus banking system hanging by a thread. But after a downard adjustment to this news last Sunday night the euro has managed to hold its own as mini-waves of optimism and pessimism have washed across the markets.

I think this steadiness in the euro in the face of bad news is interesting for three reasons. First, the market has dropped for nearly 7 weeks from its early February top. Second, this decline has brought it to a point slightly below the midpoint of the rally from the July 2012 low (blue line). Third, the spring equinox is upon us. According to Paul Montgomery of contrarian Time Magazine cover fame this year's equinox is likely to bring the lunatics out in force this week and next, giving us volatile markets and making a dramatic change in market sentiment more likely now than at other times.

And all of this is occurring in a monetary context which suggests to me that the euro is going to  appreciate against the dollar because ECB monetary policy is much tighter than the Fed's. My conservative upside target is 1.40.

So I have a strong suspicion that this chart is going to look a lot different a couple of weeks from now. I think a big rally is about to start. The first sign of an up trend in the euro will be a move above the 20 day moving average which appears in this chart as a wavy red line.


Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Conservative Contrarians Take Note



The bottom two images are today's front pages from the Chicago Tribune and the New York Times. Both note that yesterday the Dow closed at historical highs. I think the Tribune headline captures the spirit of this market pretty well. I think investors are happy to see the Dow at new highs but that skepticism about economic conditions and US economic prospects remains strong.

The top image appears on page 1 of the Tribune's business section today. It suggests a little more optimism but in my judgement "Dow 20,000" projections are not very common right now.

I don't think we are seeing a bullish information cascade here, at least not yet. Yet the Dow is at historical highs and the S&P is not far behind. In fact the S&P is just below the levels it reached at the 2000 and 2007 bull market tops. And this bull market has already lasted 4 years.

There certainly has not yet been a 200 day moving average sell signal for conservative contrarians. Nonetheless I think it makes sense for conservative contrarians to cut back stock market exposure to below normal levels now. There was no bullish information cascade visible at the 2007 top either, but we still saw a more than 50% drop from that top.

I don't like to deviate from standard operating procedure like I am doing now. But I think it makes sense to substantially lighten long positions at the top of a 13 year trading range after a bull market has lasted four years and newspaper headlines are starting to suggest increasingly bull sentiment.

Friday, February 22, 2013

Hyperinflation ahead? Not.

In this post I explained why I thought that fears of imminent high inflation resulting from the Fed's quantitative easing policy were misplaced.

Here is a post by Mark Perry which reports the latest estimate by the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland of expected inflation. Their number is an average of 1.53% annual inflation over the next 10 years. This is what they come up with after examining both bond market data as well as survey data from investors and consumers.

Of course expectations can always change. But this survey tells us that that there is no reason to think inflation will increase in any significant way base on the evidence at hand which includes the Fed's current QE policy.

Monday, February 18, 2013

Buy ? Maybe not.

Thanks to Paul Montgomery and Elliott Wave International for bringing my attention to the latest cover of a special, February 18 issue, of Maclean's magazine. Maclean's is the Canadian equivalent of Time magazine here in the US. But the cover story is all about the US stock market.

The cover story quotes Ralph Acampora, a noted US market technician, as asserting that the current bull market is climbing a classic wall of worry. He further more observes that since the public has yet to return to stocks in any significant way (as measured, say, by mutual fund money net inflows) there is a lot of upside potential even from current levels. To be fair, he also says that a "correction" now would be healthy and help to repair any cracks which have developed in the worry wall.

Frankly I am in more or less agreement with Acampora as far as the long term prospects for the US stock market go. However shorter term cracks (like this cover story) have started to appear. This is another piece of evidence which suggests that the US stock market is vulnerable to a correction which easily could take it below its November 2012 and even below its June 2012 low point.

At this juncture I think it makes sense for aggressive contrarian traders to move their stock market exposure down to below average levels. The plan would be to restore average or above average levels of stock market exposure after a drop of 5-10% (or more) in the averages, a drop which I think is coming sooner rather than later.

Saturday, February 2, 2013

Doom and Gloom about the US economy

A few days ago I received an e-mail from a friend of mine which asked my opinion about the prospects for the US dollar and the US economy. Below is his e-mail (in italics) and my reply.


Carl,

I have been reading more and more about the currency wars and getting concerned. 

Many people say that between the Fed printing USD and oil being priced in Chinese yuan the US dollar is doomed. This will eventually lead to hyperinflation here in the US as the USD loses its global currency reserve status.

I personally have no idea if this will actually happen.  I have read about Russia & China coming to an agreement where China will buy oil from Russia paying in Yuan and the views that other oil producing countries will begin selling oil in currencies other than the USD.

Do you have any thoughts on this? There is no shortage of websites pushing this end of the US dollar and USA coming soon but of course each website is also selling something to profit from this coming doom!


Otto:

There will be no hyperinflation without the Fed's cooperation. They seem very reluctant to let the inflation rate move much above 2%. The 10 year Tips - note spread predicts 2.6% annual inflation for the next 10 years so the market has a lot of confidence in the Fed's commitment to keep inflation low.

That said I think the Fed is much more concerned about domestic economic conditions than about the value of the dollar. But notice how they have dragged the Bank of Japan and the Swiss along in the QE compaign. The rest of Europe will soon follow or fall into the economic abyss. Since all the big powers will evntually embrace some version of QE and follow the Fed I don't see how the dollar is going to drop much in the long run because of monetary expansion.

The US is the strongest economic power in the world. Soon it will be the biggest oil producer and is already the biggest natural gas producer. It has the  freest market system and is home to the  most innovative business entrepreneurs. And you say that there is a danger that people might prefer to trade in yuan, not dollars?

  Apparently the message has not gotten through to the world's criminal classes - who spit on payments denominated in any restricted currency like the yuan. Free traders trade in dollars or euros or yen and trade in dollars is the biggest by far in volume.

China looks strong because they are getting up to speed after being impoverished by the 1949- 1984 experiment with central planning and communist repression. Russia looked strong in the 1950's because they were starting from a very low base, just like China today.

But if history offers any lessons it is that government controlled economies (of which China is an example even now) eventually hit a ceiling beyond which progress is no longer possible. This led to the collapse of the Soviet Union. It also happened in China starting around 1400 when the combination of the European Renaissance and Chinese imperial repression of  creative thought and action started China's long slide into poverty from which she is only just emerging.

The doomsters always have something to worry about and this has been true as long as I have been active in markets, a period of nearly 50 years now. Experience teaches that in the long run the doomsters are always wrong and are either forgotten or become a laughing stock for sensible people. I don't see any reason for thinking the fate of the current crop of doom predictors will be different.

I had a friend once who thought that the doomsters were all secretly financed by the Trilateral commission to scare the little guy into making stupid choices. I don't share his cynicism but it is certainly consistent with the facts.

Carl

more reasons for concern

Here is an image of the Chicago Tribune's front page today. It is really about the stock market, not the economy. The graph to the right shows the Dow industrials for the past 7 years.

This article also observes that stock market mutual fund inflows for US base funds were the highest ever in January 2013. This after actually being negative for a good part of 2011 and 2012.

Another interesting fact is that the weekly survey National Association of Active Investment Managers (NAAIM) shows a commitment to the stock market of over 100%, the first time this number has been over 100% since January 2007 (at which point the 2002-2007 bull market still had 9 months to go).

I think these observations adds to a growing body of evidence that this 47 month old bull market is getting close to its end. But I don't think this end is here just yet.Typically the maximum bullish sentiment occurs a few months before the highs in the market averages.

Thursday, January 31, 2013

interest rates and the economy



What determines the level of the 10 year note yield (top chart)? I'd say that this yield depends on investor expectations about two things: the real rate of growth in the economy and the rate of inflation over the next 10 years. We can simplify this idea even further by saying that the level of 10 year note yields should roughly equal investor forecasts of the average annual rate of growth in NOMINAL (no inflation adjustment) gross domestic product  over the next 10 years.

As you can see in the chart investors are expecting nominal GDP to grow at about a 2% annual rate for the next 10 years. Since people expect inflation rates of at least 2% as far as the eye can see, this level of interest rates suggests that investors think that the real economy will not grow at all during the next 10 years!

You can get another read on this expectation by looking at the yield on the 10 year TIPS (inflation protected treasury notes) which were auctioned at a rate of a NEGATVE 0.63% a few days ago. People who bought these notes are paying the US treasury to take their money and spend it!!!  From a purely mechanical point of view the difference between the yields on the 10 year note and the 10 year tips represents investor's expectation of the rate of inflation over the next 10 years. In this case the difference is 2.60%. Put another way, the 10 year TIPS yield suggests that investors think the real economy will shrink by 0.60% per year over the next 10 years while inflation averages 2.00% per year! Of course there is probably a fairly big risk premium built into the negative TIPS yield so the forecast is not really as pessimistic as this. Even so I still think this is an incredible forecast for the US economy.

Is this forecast likely to be close to the mark? I don't think so. I think people are grossly underestimating the likely effects of the Fed's quantitative easing policy and the Fed's commitment to pursue that policy at least until the US unemployment rate drops below 6.5% (it is currently 7.8%). The Fed's policy is having an effect on the Euro which is steadily rising against the dollar (middle chart). The Euro is above it rising 200 day moving average as well as above its rising 50 day moving average, a bullish configuration if there ever was one. The market is pricing in not just the survival of the Euro currency but also the fact that the Fed's monetary policy is relatively loose compare with that of the European Central Bank. Liquidity in the US is increasing relative to Europe's. This will inevitably lead to a pick up in US economic activity relative to that of the EU and a further advance in the Euro against the dollar.

The market thinks that the Fed will also be getting help from the Japanese central bank in pushing upward world economic activity. The bottom chart shows the yen priced in dollars. This bear market in the yen is a forecast of a big expansion in yen liquidity relative to dollar liquidity (which of course is itself increasing). This would be an enormous change in policy by the Bank of Japan (if it occurs) and will have very positive effects on the Japanese and the world economies.

All in all I think the market forecast of only 2% annual growth in nominal US GDP over the next 10 years is plain silly. My own guess is that this number will come in closer to 5% or even higher. If I am right 10 year note yields are in the early stages of an advance which will last several years. You can see that the 50 day moving average of this yield has finally climbed above the 200 day moving average, the first time this has happened in years. This I think is a harbinger of a long term bear market in bond prices.